I haven't tried the unix distro yet, but don't expect any issue. Thomas had posted a number of bugs, some critical, with fixes i wish could be included, but would rather see a release out.
We're now using c binding successfully in two projects. +1 on release Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Martin Veith <[email protected]> wrote: >> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big >> mental hurdle to getting started. > I fully agree with you. > >> Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the >> example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away. > At the moment the dist-Readme.txt in each example folder of the source bundle > (which corresponds to the Readme.txt of the binary packages) contains the > information about the required .NET 4.0 Framework and the description how to > build the C example using CMake. > What in your opinion is still missing? > >> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part. >> >> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path >> would have saved a lot of grief > So is everything now working on your machine? Is there something we should > improve or fix for this release or is it ok for you to publish it as it is? > > Thanks > Martin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Comer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 13:17 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages > > I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big > mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the > readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is > far away. > > I did figure out the .net 4.0 part. > > Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path > would have saved a lot of grief > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Scott, >> >> thanks for your reply. >> >>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should >>> be called out? >>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to >>> validate? >> According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use >> of SHA-1 should be avoided. >> Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the >> website as soon as the release is out. >> Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums >> can be found on the website too. >> >>> the ant build of example\helloworld works. >>> the java version of example\helloworld works. >>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error >>> code. >> Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had >> dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework. >> In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your >> path. >> This information is also available in the Readme file of each example. >> Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error? >> >> As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a >> BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release >> and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility. >> >>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should >>> be. >> As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for >> example_mixin and helloworld. >> The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases >> because we don't ship the ant-cmake library. >> Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file >> too. >> >> Cheers, >> Martin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: scott comer [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages >> >> because of the no c version of examples, i vote: >> >> -1 >> >> scott >> >> On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote: >>> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1: >>> >>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should >>> be called out? >>> >>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to >>> validate? >>> >>> installation verified. >>> >>> the ant build of example\helloworld works. >>> the java version of example\helloworld works. >>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error >>> code. >>> >>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should >>> be. >>> >>> scott out >>> >>> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote: >>>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far. >>>> >>>> so +1 from my side >>>> >>>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please >>>> review it! >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49 >>>> An:[email protected] >>>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages >>>> >>>> +1 from me >>>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martin >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18 >>>> To:[email protected] >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of >>>> Apache Etch. >>>> >>>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the >>>> README.txt and >>>> >>>> BUILD.txt files. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please vote for this release package: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good >>>> >>>> [ ] +0 Don't care >>>> >>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This vote will run for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your votes, >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> Martin >>> >>> >>
