Hi Scott,We have seen the issues from Thomas. After the 1.2 release we
will work on the issues and try to fix those up to the next bug fixing
release.
@Martijn I think for publishing the release we still need a vote from
one of our mentors. It would be great if you could still have a look
to it.
ThanksMichael
2011/12/16 Scott Comer <[email protected]>:
> I haven't tried the unix distro yet, but don't expect any issue. Thomas had
> posted a number of bugs, some critical, with fixes i wish could be included,
> but would rather see a release out.
>
> We're now using c binding successfully in two projects.
>
> +1 on release
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 16, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Martin Veith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a
>>> big mental hurdle to getting started.
>> I fully agree with you.
>>
>>> Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the
>>> example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
>> At the moment the dist-Readme.txt in each example folder of the source
>> bundle (which corresponds to the Readme.txt of the binary packages) contains
>> the information about the required .NET 4.0 Framework and the description
>> how to build the C example using CMake.
>> What in your opinion is still missing?
>>
>>> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>>>
>>> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path
>>> would have saved a lot of grief
>> So is everything now working on your machine? Is there something we should
>> improve or fix for this release or is it ok for you to publish it as it is?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Comer [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 13:17
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>
>> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big
>> mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the
>> readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is
>> far away.
>>
>> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>>
>> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path
>> would have saved a lot of grief
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>>> be called out?
>>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>>> validate?
>>> According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the
>>> use of SHA-1 should be avoided.
>>> Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the
>>> website as soon as the release is out.
>>> Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check
>>> sums can be found on the website too.
>>>
>>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>>> code.
>>> Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had
>>> dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework.
>>> In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in
>>> your path.
>>> This information is also available in the Readme file of each example.
>>> Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error?
>>>
>>> As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a
>>> BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release
>>> and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility.
>>>
>>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>>> be.
>>> As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for
>>> example_mixin and helloworld.
>>> The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases
>>> because we don't ship the ant-cmake library.
>>> Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file
>>> too.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: scott comer [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>
>>> because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
>>>
>>> -1
>>>
>>> scott
>>>
>>> On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
>>>> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>>>>
>>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>>> be called out?
>>>>
>>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>>> validate?
>>>>
>>>> installation verified.
>>>>
>>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>>> code.
>>>>
>>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>>> be.
>>>>
>>>> scott out
>>>>
>>>> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>>>>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> so +1 from my side
>>>>>
>>>>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>>>>> review it!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>>>>> An:[email protected]
>>>>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me
>>>>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>>>>> To:[email protected]
>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>>>>> Apache Etch.
>>>>>
>>>>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>>>>> README.txt and
>>>>>
>>>>> BUILD.txt files.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote for this release package:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your votes,
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
