On 2/17/07, Quentin Mathé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 17 févr. 07 à 20:22, Nicolas Roard a écrit :
>> I think we won't avoid to handle gnustep-gui releases ourself time to
>> time :-/
>
> What do you mean by that ?.. fork gnustep-gui ?
Huh not at all :-)
I just mean someone (who has commit access to gnustep svn) will have
to make a release, mostly to avoid having to delay our own release by
four months or more. It depends if gnustep-gui releases occur more
often in the future or not.
Oh well.. not sure about that. It's not because we have commit rights
to the gnustep svn that we can make a release just like that, don't
you think ? I mean, it's really the job of the gnustep-gui maintener,
currently greg. Though of course, if we truly *depends* on a
particular version, I guess we could convaince the maintener to make a
release...
We are going to use almost all features available in gnustep-gui and
even push them beyond expectations time to time, then we will
encounter bugs and missing features quite often.
See recent bug reports by Guenther on gnustep-dev about NSOutlineView
for an example.
Yes.
But see david's point about the livecd. I think we should focus on the
livecd, so we can easily *demonstrate* a complete environment. Of
course, people that want can use étoilé from tgz releases (do we have
automatic snapshots from the svn set up by the way ? that would be
helpful!) or directly from the svn -- we just need to indicate
somewhere which gnustep version or svn release number we rely on.
--
Nicolas Roard
"La perfection, ce n'est pas quand il n'y a plus rien à ajouter, c'est
quand il n'y a plus rien à retrancher." -- Antoine de St-Exupéry
_______________________________________________
Etoile-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-dev
