Le 16 mars 07 à 15:27, David Chisnall a écrit :
On 16 Mar 2007, at 12:47, Isaiah Beerbower wrote:
Will the GNU FDL be fine for documentation?
I haven't given much thought to documentation licensing. The GFDL
has some issues that make it non-Free (the whole invariant sections
thing, for example). I tend to regard any documentation I write as
being effectively PD, but it's up to you. Unlike code,
documentation licenses are unlikely to affect other things very
much. The only slight confusion might come from things like gsdoc-
generated documentation; I'm not sure what the legal issues are of
mixing two licenses in the same file (the GFDL is not LGPL
compatible, for example)...
We should add a note on the website about our documentation licensing
choice, don't you think? At this time most of the documentation isn't
made available under any licenses, this should be corrected.
Outside of Public Domain, which licenses would be ok for
documentation in your opinion?
Cheers,
Quentin.
_______________________________________________
Etoile-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
