On 2007-03-16 11:43:38 -0400 Isaiah Beerbower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The FreeBSD documentation license (http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-doc-license.html) is fairly similar to the modified BSD license. It is, however, missing the third clause (The name of the author may not be used to endorse ... without specific prior written permission.) which I think would be a good idea to have. ...
The clause prohibiting using the name of the author for endorsement is already covered by other laws, and so is essentially a no-op in a copyright license. So the third clause is not strictly necessary.
-- Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
