While your post may be helpful to some, I have to disagree here, at
least to some extent.  Linux Rocks, as they say, and to compare RedHat
to Microshaft is a Bad Idea, I think.  To be specific, Linux Rocks, and
Red Hat has brought linux to more people than any other distro (*), so
why bad-mouth it?  Why suggest another distro, just because you can't
answer a redhat-specific question?  Sure, I know there are plenty of
folks who are hungry to try something new -- in other words, they're
already hooked.  Brian here came to us with an issue that was keeping
him from using Linux, y'know, in a useful way... and if he happened to
be using the distro you know well, then I know you could help directly. 
But it strikes me as the scenario where they need one little fix, not to
re-install their dual-boot setup -- and imagine the potential dismay of
a newcomer (tho I know you've been around a bit, Brian) who is told to
reinstall linux wholesale, instead of fixing the one little problem.
Disclaimer:  I'm totally for Linux, I also think it Rocks!  However,
when someone comes to me with a problem, I start by asking if they have
the latest versions of what they're using (and if they've backed up) no
matter what it is that they're using.  "Getting the latest version" is
not required, but generally a good thing, and if there is any reason not
to do so, then the changelogs since the version in use should be
examined for the issue...  and so forth.  Assuming that the machine in
question is hoping to be a useful tool for the user, reinstalling the OS
is a productivity-killer.  Further, I love that we gnurds throw our
lives at these machines, but hope to help keep the general populace from
needing to also become tools of the tools  = )  I hope my points here
can be well-taken, and to finish, I'd like to remind our readership that
there are indeed many many many redhat users out there, and yes many use
it for the simple (and some would say evil) purpose of binary
compatibility -- "hardcore" geeks would want to compile everything, a la
Gentoo or LFS, however a lot of users do not have that requirement. 
Regardless, RedHat is still a Great Linux in my book, capable of a lot,
and likely to be on the cutting edge for support of any given hardware
you might be struggling to use...  Cheers to that!
Phew, people get so edgy around standardization, especially when it
comes from afar  = )

(*) - I have no reference off-hand.  Anyone?  I'd be happy to find
some figures if anyone's interested....

On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 02:01:02 -0700
Linux Rocks ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

| Brian,
|       Well... if your priority is mainstream, then maybe you need
|       Windows. As far 
| as I can tell, redhat is the microsoft of the linux community. Ive
| spent a lot of time trying various linux's, and have  found Mandrake
| to be far superior to RedHat, its actually based on redhat, but it
| usually  works much better. If you like  the way redhat does things,
| maybe mandrake is a good thing for you to try. Alternatively SuSE is
| also very easy to install and has a decent userbase. Personally I
| prefer Slackware, but its not really a newbie type system (although it
| gets easier every new version...)
| 
| Jamie
| 
| On Monday 02 June 2003 03:27 pm, BAGGAB wrote:
| : Jamie
| :
| : Thanks for the vote of confidence (it was kind of boneheaded of me
| for: waiting so long.)
| :
| : I'm using RH because it is the mainstream distro.  I have talked to
| many: people outside of technical community.  I would say that 75%
| have never: even heard of Linux.  So when Business Week highlighted
| Linux on their: front cover I was excited.  In that article it flatly
| stated "Linux: Startups: Other then Red Hat, there's not much room for
| these small fry": and "Linux Purists: Linux developers who don't like
| the idea of working: with
| : capitalists had better get used to it."
| :
| : Now you and I may feel differently, but that's the perception (when
| there: is one.)  I just want the people I help to bring OSS mainstream
| to know the: front runner.  These many other distro's are too
| perplexing (the many: choices that is) to the novice user, who may
| never be a technician, but may: be willing to use Open Office if
| someone "holds their hand.":
| : Brian
| :
| : P.S. I am getting tired of the struggle.  I have floated my idea for
| an: educational website focusing on engineering and the environment to
| a local: group, for the last time.  If they are not interested I will
| go it alone: and I won't much care about who knows OSS then and I will
| use what comes: easiest.
_______________________________________________
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Reply via email to