Rich Rudman wrote: > Roger... you are getting close to engineering by the data > sheets.
Guilty as charged ;^> (Whaddaya mean 'close'??) > We are learning things that are NOT in the Spec sheets. > Please refrain from Spanking us up side the Head with data > that may not be too relavant. Sorry, but I'll keep spanking as long as that is what it takes to shake your data out into the open. If the data in the data sheets is not relevant, we *all* need to know about it, and if you guys have data that backs up claims contradicting the manufacturer's own published data, you gotta share it if you want those claims to be accepted. I'd really rather not spank ;^> > Thermal managment. Hey Roger,You live in the colder > climes.... NO HEATERS!!! Get the point???? I know, I know, same as you and Sheer; I'm just playing devil's advocate for those many people who live inland and/or south of us where the temperature extremes *do* get to where thermal management could be required for at least one end of the range (possibly with either chemistry). Lots of people get by without thermal management on their PbA packs, that doesn't mean you and I wouldn't be happier with it than without it, same as we could get by without it on NiZn, but some poor guy in Tucson is going to be swearing at his (and wouldn't be if he were using PbA). > The trick is to get the pertinant battery data out of the > battery rack and into some place that we can do somthing > usefull with it. > > It's the end of the summer and I think we can start to tell > folks what they can and can't do to a set of Evercells. By > next spring I hope there are more than a few Evercell EVs out there. Sounds great! Cheers, Roger.
