The numbers you post for Tesla do not include charger losses, the 216 Wh/mile does. The 196 Wh/mile number should be compared. Either way 216 or 196 is far less energy/mile than a Tesla S uses, so more efficient at moving one human around, which is the typical occupancy.
Maybe you are considering efficiency as energy/mile-weight. Then the Tesla would be 325/4750 lb = 0.068 to 375/4750 = 0.079 and my car would be 196/2260 = 0.087, so the Tesla moves a unit weight more efficiently than my car assuming those numbers represent the same 50% mix of highway and city driving. -- View this message in context: http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Re-EVLN-Open-Source-Street-Legal-affordable-long-range-EV-4the-masses-tp4675590p4675619.html Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
