Thanks Lee, that is neat to know.  I freely admit having little
understanding of lead acid.

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Lee Hart via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:

> Michael Ross via EV wrote:
>
>> I think it is very valuable knowing that a Li ion cell can hold its charge
>> indefinitely.  Particularly compared to the incumbent competitor - lead
>> acid cells.  There is a least an implication that the the loses may be of
>> no consequence after design and manufacturing improvements.  There is no
>> possibility of achieving this ever with lead acid.
>>
>
> Surprisingly, that's not entirely the case.
>
> The self-discharge rate of a battery is usually traded off with many other
> parameters; capacity, life, peak current, etc. For most lead-acid
> batteries, the market considers factors other than self-discharge to be a
> *lot* more important.
>
> But, there are exceptions. I just pulled some Gates "Cyclon" spiral-wound
> lead-acid gel cell off the shelf. They were purchased in Nov 1994, and used
> for 5 years in electric lawn mower. My notes say the last time they were
> charged was on Nov 14, 2000. At that time, they still had about 1.5ah of
> capacity (out of their original 2.5ah). Today, 4 out of 13 *still* have
> charge in them (1.9v or more open circuit).
>
> One reason for this is that Gates used *pure* virgin lead; not a lead
> alloy. Almost all other lead-acid batteries alloy the lead with antimony,
> calcium, cobalt, or just the random mix of junk left over in scrap lead.
> Or, someone will have watered the battery with tap water, which adds its
> own unknown impurities. All this "stuff" worsens the self-discharge
> characteristics. But that doesn't matter to most customers; they will be
> recharging the battery often enough so it never runs dead.
>
> If you care, Gates was bought out by GE, who sold out to Hawker, who is
> now owned by Enersys. So you can still buy these Cyclons today! But they
> have an insignificant market, because (almost) no one cares about
> self-discharge.
>
>  On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Cor van de Water via EV<
>> ev@lists.evdl.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  David,
>>>
>>> Why do all manufacturers of Li-Ion batteries specify the amount of
>>> self-discharge
>>> and why do people like me who monitor Li-Ion batteries over time, see and
>>> measure
>>> the self-discharge?
>>> I understand that you say "theoretical" the pure Li-Ion cell may not
>>> have a
>>> self discharge mechanism and thus the actual present self-discharge
>>> appears to be
>>> a spurious effect, possibly caused by contamination, so the amount of
>>> self-discharge
>>> is a quality indicator of the (lack of) contamination in the cell...
>>>
>>> However, saying that the ideal (theoretical) cell does not have any
>>> self-discharge is as valuable
>>> as saying that the ideal (theoretical) connection does not have any
>>> resistance.
>>> In practice however you better take that resistance into account when
>>> sizing your wiring and connections.
>>> Similar to taking self-discharge (and especially the difference in
>>> self-discharge between cells) into account
>>> when designing a battery pack.
>>>
>>> Cor van de Water
>>> Chief Scientist
>>> Proxim Wireless
>>>
>>> office +1 408 383 7626                 Skype: cor_van_de_water
>>> XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                 private: cvandewater.info
>>> www.proxim.com
>>>
>>>
>>> This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and
>>> proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received
>>> this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
>>> unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
>>> this
>>> message is prohibited.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of David Nelson
>>> via
>>> EV
>>> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 4:37 PM
>>> To: Bill Dube; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: [EVDL] "Zero self-discharge" (was: Bicycle battery)
>>>
>>> Bill,
>>>
>>> I have dug through many scientific papers on Li batteries and how they
>>> work and I haven't been able to find anything about a theoretical
>>> self-discharge mechanism. I have found some explicitly talking about the
>>> lack of a charge shuttle mechanism like in lead-acid batteries, however.
>>>
>>> One paper I read has a section devoted to figuring out a charge shuttle
>>> mechanism to add to a Li cell. It isn't a paper for the faint of heart,
>>> however. It is "Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based
>>> Rechargeable Batteries" by Kang Xu published in the Chemical Review,
>>> 2004,
>>> Vol. 104, No. 10, pp. 4303-4417 and published on the web 09/16/2004.
>>>
>>> While I'm sure I don't get it 100% of the time I try to make sure I say,
>>> "LiFePO4 cells have no theoretical self discharge mechanism."
>>> This, according to all I have been able to find on the cells, is true.
>>> Also, the most ardent anti-BMS people I have found have in fact done a
>>> lot
>>> of searching of the scientific literature and came to the same
>>> conclusion.
>>> It was not just something they made up to support their anti-BMS
>>> position.
>>>
>>> If you have other literature showing what the self-discharge mechanism is
>>> please share it.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Bill Dube via EV<ev@lists.evdl.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This "zero self-discharge" myth seems to be a common thread with the
>>>> "anti-BMS" crowd. I don't know where this misinformation comes from.
>>>>
>>>>          All cells have self-discharge. It is just a matter of degree.
>>>> Also, the self-discharge varies from cell to cell. That's why you need a
>>>>
>>> BMS.
>>>
>>>> These are well-documented facts for all those that care to
>>>> investigate, either through the scientific literature or by simply
>>>> systematically testing cells for themselves (as Lee Hart has done.)
>>>>
>>>>          I strongly suspect the "zero self-discharge" myth comes from
>>>> the same unscientific source that the anti-BMS myth has sprung from.
>>>>
>>>>          Bill D.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>>>> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
>>>> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
>>>> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> David D. Nelson
>>>
>>
>
> --
> The greatest pleasure in life is to create something that wasn't
> there before. -- Roy Spence
> --
> Lee Hart, 814 8th Ave N, Sartell MN 56377, www.sunrise-ev.com
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA (
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
>


-- 
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk.
Thomas A. Edison
<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/t/thomasaed125362.html>

A public-opinion poll is no substitute for thought.
*Warren Buffet*

Michael E. Ross
(919) 585-6737 Land
(919) 576-0824 <https://www.google.com/voice/b/0?pli=1#phones> Google Phone
(919) 631-1451 Cell

michael.e.r...@gmail.com
<michael.e.r...@gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20150620/f20037dc/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to