On 16 Feb 2012, at 21:53, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Are you talking about tautology?
"true in no context whatsoever" looks more like a contradiction (the
negation of a tautology).
Bruno
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net
> wrote:
On 2/16/2012 2:15 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
[SPK] All of this substitution stuff is predicated upon the
possibility that the brain can be emulated by a Universal Turing
Machine. It would be helpful if we first established that a Turing
Machine is capable of what we are assuming it do be able to do. I
am pretty well convinced that it cannot
Well at least, you state now that you think comp is simply false...
so it's just trolling about it, when you just reject the premices...
Is there a difference between a statement being true given some
context and the same sentence being true in no context whatsoever?
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
