On 8/23/2012 4:53 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com
<mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> The laws of nature are such that they demand that we do things
intentionally. This means neither random nor completely determined
externally.
I see, you did it but you didn't do it for a reason and you didn't do
it for no reason. I think Lewis Carroll best summed up your ideas on
this subject:
T was brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
> Are your opinions on free will robotic or random? In either
case, would there be any point in anyone else paying attention to
them
Point? It sounds like you're asking for a reason, well such a reason
either exists or it does not. If other people pay attention to my
views they do so for a reason or they do not do so for a reason. If
other people do NOT pay attention to my views they do so for a reason
or they do not do so for a reason.
John K Clark
Does the chain of reasons stop at some point or is it an infinite regress?
--
Onward!
Stephen
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
