Our discussion is going nowhere. You don't see my points and assume I want to attack you (and thus are defensive and not open to my criticism), and I am obviously frustrated by that, which is not conducive to a good discussion.
We are not opertaing on the same level. You argue using rational, "precise" arguments, while I am precisely showing how these don't settle or even adress the issue. Like with Gödel, sure we can embed all the meta in arithmetic, but then we still need a super-meta (etc...). There is no proof that can change this, and thus it is pointless to study proofs regarding this issue (as they just introduce new metas because their proof is not written in arithmetic). benjayk -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Simple-proof-that-our-intelligence-transcends-that-of-computers-tp34330236p34417635.html Sent from the Everything List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
