On 04 Jan 2013, at 09:24, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/4/2013 12:05 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
IMHO Sheldrake is one of the very few who have had the courage to
prove and call materialism bad science.
You don't know how to count. The world is full of mystics and the
superstitious who don't even know what "materialism" means. They
are 90% of the Earth's population - the ignorant 90%.
I think he is the vanguard
of good science, which is not blinded by materialism's dogmas.
So why doesn't he do an experiment that tests his theory and can be
replicated?
A necessary revolution is in the making, for one thing because
materialism
can't explain consciousness because of its dogmas (everything must
be physical).
That doesn't mean that anything that is not materialism can explain
consciousness. Materialism at least explain why getting hit on the
head changes your consciousness.
It does not. Or you have to tell the flaw in UDA, or to give your (no-
comp) theory of mind, and the materialist explanation.
Bruno
Brent
The first principle of religion is to fool yourself - and you
are the easiest person for you to fool.
--- with apologies to R. Feynman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
