On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net> wrote: > Hi socra...@bezeqint.net > > > That's not bad, except that Monads, while they cannot see directly, > are able to see the entire universe, including the dark parts of other > monads > indirectly, by allowing the Supreme Monad to be their eyes, reflecting an > image of > the entire universe of other monads back to each monad. So each monad > can indirecty see the entire universe, including its dark parts, > but only from its own perspective, and distorted by its own imperfections. > Moreorless as you might see of the night sky through a bit of haze and > not directly, but in a snapshot taken by a camera with a cheap lens.
Yes, roger. The Supreme Monad is the Akasha of Hinduism. wiki- " In Sanskrit the word means "space", the very first element in creation." In string cosmology, it corresponds to a 4 dimensioal block spacetime in which everything that has ever happened or possibly happen is recorded along with all the possible futures. http://www.neuroquantology.com/index.php/journal/article/view/285 > > Kant does it quite differently, and his model, much less awkward, > is widely accepted in current neurophilosophy. Leibniz's account > is more awkward because he insists that monads can only interact > indirectly (they have no windows). > > While L gives a complete but awkward account, including the > "things-in'themselves", Kant only uses the sensual or phenomenol information > (things for themselves), since he was sparring with the empiricists. > The sensual information however is sorted into pre-existing categories > in order to make sens of what is observed (by any sense). > > Leibniz does allow you to go into the darkness somewhat, > while Kant gives a more limited, although much more straightforward account > of perception. > > > > > > > [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] > 1/15/2013 > "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > From: socra...@bezeqint.net > Receiver: Everything List > Time: 2013-01-14, 14:39:29 > Subject: Re: Science is a religion by itself. > > I will try to understand situation from today fashion physical point > of view. > =. > Let us say that Plato's world of ideas is a dark mass > ( because nobody knows that their are). > > And Leibniz monadas and Kant's things-in- themselves are > quantum particles ( because nobody knows their physical parameters). > > We can suppose that the dark mass (the world of ideas) > is consist of quantum particles (monads / things-in-themselves). > > And then all these monadas / quantum particles were pressed > together in . . . . a 'singular point ' . . . by some power. > But after some time they felt themselves uncomfortable and > . . . . separated as a 'big bang'. > > In this way we can understand the connection between physics and > philosophy of idealism and the existence ( from today point of > view) . > > If somebody didn't understand me I can explain the modern physical > point of view on existence in the other words. > > You was born because your mother was pregnant, > and your mother was born because you was pregnant. > == > socratus > > > > On Jan 14, 5:44爌m, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote: >> On 13 Jan 2013, at 07:22, socra...@bezeqint.net wrote: >> >> > 燭he Seven Hermetic Principles >> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTFCpkrM2iI >> > =. >> > 1. The Universe is something Intellectual. >> > 2. As above, so below. >> > 3. From potential to active existence. >> > 4. Everything in the Universe can vibrate. >> > 5. Everything in the Universe has its cause. >> > 6. Everything in the Universe has its opposite. >> > 7. The Universe has its own rhythm. >> >> Hmm... This is already too much Aristotelian to fit with >> computationalism. >> >> >> >> > / Hermes Trismegistus / >> > =. >> > Can these Seven Hermetic Principles be explained >> > by physical laws and formulas ? >> >> We have first to explain the physical laws appearances, and formula, >> in comp, and thus in arithmetic. See (*) for a concise explanation. >> >> Bruno >> >> (*) >> 爃ttp://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHALAbstract... >> >> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
