On 27 March 2014 20:12, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote: > On 26 Mar 2014, at 04:44, LizR wrote: > > I said that the "continuity is of exactly the same nature" (not that the > states were the same - in fact the states are successor states, as I > mentioned - which is something assumed to exist but still to be defined). > > I think that the successor states are well defined, in the 3p view, and i > the 1p view too, even if the domain of the 1p indeterlinacy is a complex > and highly non constructive notion. > > How does one define a successor state, or states? (I would guess as a state that has a most recent memory of the preceeding state, perhaps?)
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
