On Monday, March 31, 2014 6:41:55 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: > > I'm not sure collapse is an observed fact. Collapse is an assumption which > explains how we come to measure discrete values. > Would mind helping me place your meaning in terms of mine Liz? , Say, if we imagine a process of stripping back the meaning of 'wave-function' based on the single goal only, of finding the common ground starting point, least open to different - likely mis-conception, very likely my side. On that basis, my stripped back wave-function is the pattern made on the in the two slit experiment, by all those particles coming through, where each one hits. Purely on that temporary definition alone, would we be on common ground (a) so far as it goes - given the goal - it's a legitimate definition (b) the wave function is an observed fact, and so is its collapse? . Else, if the only facts I'm managing to reveal is the embarrassing kind like the sorry ass paucity of my basic grasp of things, hey....don't be embarrassed :O) Give it to me straight
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
