"Childrens' dreams are run with rats.."  The WHO, Helpless Dancer. 



-----Original Message-----
From: LizR <lizj...@gmail.com>
To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Jun 15, 2014 2:23 am
Subject: Re: "Rats! I should have done that, not this!"



On 15 June 2014 18:12, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:

          
    
On 6/14/2014 10:19 PM, LizR wrote:
    
    
      
        
          
On 15 June 2014 16:49, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net>            wrote:
            
On              6/14/2014 9:37 PM, LizR wrote:
              
                
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140608-regret-rats-neuroscience-behavior-animals-science
              
              
              Interesting that this experiment is all about qualia,             
 which we're told are ineffable and can't be possessed by              
computers because they're not human.
            
            

            
            
Yes. At least we assume there are qualia involved. The              experiment 
only measures their "neural correlates" (since              you can't ask a rat 
what it's experiencing, obviously              that's all they can do, of 
course).
          
        
      
    
    
But if you asked and the rat replied that would just be a different    neural 
correlate.



No it wouldn't. That would be the rat introspecting and telling you about its 
subjective impressions. There would presumably be neural correlates to that 
process, which could in principle be detected, but the rat replying wouldn't be 
those, it would be the rat replying.



            
However, I'm sure Bruno would be happy to allow a              suitably 
programmed computer to have qualia.
            
          
        
      
    
    
Bruno proposes that consciousness goes along with being able to    understand 
the proof of Godel's incompleteness theorem.  I think    that's too high a bar. 
There must be different levels and kinds of    consciousness.




He does? I must admit I haven't come across that in the parts of comp I've 
tried to understand so far. Could you elucidate?

    
    And there's this 
experiment:http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/36705/title/Manipulating-Mouse-Memory/
    
    Which is another step toward being able to engineer consciousness.     Once 
that is possible, questions about qualia will seem just another    way of 
talking about neuroscience.




I don't see how they're engineering consciousness. Presumably the mouse's brain 
can do that (assuming mice are in fact conscious). As far as I can tell from 
the article, they appear to be creating false memories, i.e. changing what the 
mice are conscious of.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to