On 22 Aug 2014, at 00:08, John Mikes wrote:
On 21 Aug 2014, at 01:45, meekerdb wrote:
...awareness: JM's response to relations. This is very low level,
like my thermostat is aware of the temperature because it has a
specific response to it in service of a goal.
self-awareness: Having an interior mental model in which self is
represented alongside other 3p elements of the model, i.e. my koi
know where they are in the pond.
consciousness: Creating a narrative account of events for memory and
calling up those memories in developing "responses to relations".
self-consciousness: Reflective awareness of consciousness, i.e.
attributing thought and intention to the 3p model of one's self.
Dunno if those are useful, but they seem to me to be a kind of
hierarchy of consciousness ...
So that "SELF" makes all the difference. Any ID for it?
BTW the thermostat is not aware - it responds to the setting
relation.
Then there is the overvaluation of the "3p" - our (so-far composed)
VIEW in/of our world-view. Your koi 'know' that pond.
I am not sure about "my-self" either: I think I include certain
attributes etc. but restricted to those elements (items?) we already
have included into our inventory.
(Could Bruno detail a complete inventory of a Loebian machine?)
What do you mean by a complete inventory of a machine? With machine,
except for computability, there are basically nothing complete or
universal about them. Machines can defeat all complete theories about
them.
How do we store recallable memories, to be used in actual
brain(function)?
(please spare me from the childish protein-etc. alleged
conformational codes which have to be recalled first in order to
'save', 'recall' and apply).
How do we have any mentality that reflects into the output of our
brain(function) (what I call the tool for such)?
Computationalism does not make any special assumption here, beyond the
idea that no actual infinities, or magic divine intervention, are at
play in the working of the brain/body.
Bruno
John M
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:40 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net>
wrote:
On 8/21/2014 1:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Aug 2014, at 01:45, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/20/2014 2:20 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Brent: why should "spiders" (etc.) be 'not conscious'?
I think they are, in a way. But if I were pitching the idea of
uploading someone's mother into a virtual reality and warranting
that said virtual mother would be conscious, I don't think I'd
mention that the concept of "conscious" was elastic enough to
include spiders.
BTW what is your take on "conscious"? I have no idea myself,
because I consider "everything" an 'observer' that tackles info
about anything - and
the brainfunction(?) invoked by many for conscious processes
lacks the connection in our present scintific catasters
(measurements?) to topical contents (distinctions).
When I have to speak about 'consciousness' I have a different
meaning in mind from 'being conscious' (an elusive term).
Ccness means in my vocabulary the 'response to relations'. A
process.
I tried to distinguish that, which I called "awarness" from "self-
awarness". Maybe I should lay out my idea of these levels of
consciousness, not claiming they have some metaphysical
significance, just terminology:
awareness: JM's response to relations. This is very low level,
like my thermostat is aware of the temperature because it has a
specific response to it in service of a goal.
self-awareness: Having an interior mental model in which self is
represented alongside other 3p elements of the model, i.e. my koi
know where they are in the pond.
consciousness: Creating a narrative account of events for memory
and calling up those memories in developing "responses to
relations".
self-consciousness: Reflective awareness of consciousness, i.e.
attributing thought and intention to the 3p model of one's self.
Dunno if those are useful, but they seem to me to be a kind of
hierarchy of consciousness that is more descriptive and finer than
Bruno's "any universal Turing machine".
Are you kidding me or what?
We have the raw consciousness for *all* universal machine, yes,
then we nhave self-consciousness for the Löbian machines, which are
much more than universal machine, then we have the 8 internal
views, and all the refinement between belief, knowledge,
observation, feeling, all being themselves nuanced by the G and G*
separation, and all this in a testable (and tested ) way, thanks to
the observation part.
But, as I understand it, those computational based categories make
no distinction between the jumping spider (what do you have against
web spiders?) the dog and me in terms of consciousness. We all have
feelings, knoweldge, make observations. But I think there are other
qualitative differences as I said above.
Brent
Then the differences which remain are the difference between the
particular "[]" (PA, ZF, you, me, ...).
The difference between consciousness and awareness is a bit 1004 in
this thread.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
