On 2 September 2014 09:21, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did I come close? > > Dunno. I was asking what you meant when you replied to my earlier post.
I said (commenting on the SSA and the Doomsday Argument): Actually I'm surprised that there are *no* "populous" universes anywhere in > the string landscape / level 4 multiverse (if such exist). Or perhaps it's > more likely that there are, but their proportion is so much lower than our > sort that the chances are still better to find oneself in a universe where > the life of civilisations is either nasty, brutish and short, or involves > us evolving into an "Childhood's End" style Overmind. > > You replied: and HOW ON EARTH (verbatim: this one) would you know the entire World? Not to ask: what would you call 'populous'? Is a trillion 'many'? Please do ot quote Adam and Eve, Adam started out to be alone with a spare rib. And they(?) made the entire crowd. I didn't understand how your reply related to what I said. I still don't. I am happy to talk about being steered by aliens as per 2001 if you like but if you aren't actually responding to what I said maybe you could start another thread. Or if you are, please explain what the connection is. (Please keep it simple, I am a bear of little brain.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
