On 09 Apr 2015, at 03:16, meekerdb wrote:

On 4/8/2015 5:34 PM, LizR wrote:
On 9 April 2015 at 11:16, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Apr 2015, at 02:35, Bruce Kellett wrote:

Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Apr 2015, at 04:51, Bruce Kellett wrote:

I understand what you are claiming, but I do not agree with it. The primary physical universe certainly exists, Then computationalism is false. But what are your evidence for a *primary* physical universe. That is an axiom by Aristotle, and I believe animals are hard-wired to make some extrapolation here (for not doubting the prey and the predators), but there are no scientific evidence for a *primary* physical object.

There is no scientific evidence for a universal dovetailer either.

We don't need evidence here. The existence of the universal dovetailer, and of all its finite pieces of executions is already a theorem of very elementary arithmetic. Those things exist in the same sense that prime number exist.

Which is merely as thought patterns in the brains of physical beings.

A large (and familiar on this list) metaphysical leap, which fails to explain how two cultures can discover the same maths, or indeed why maths "kicks back" at all.

I don't think it fails in that respect at all. Different cultures live in the same universe with the same physics. Cultures are made up of entities that compete in the Darwinian sense. So they are bound to have the concept of units, addition, etc. It seems to me that it may more of a problem to explain the conceptualization of arithmetic in Bruno's TOE, even though it's built on arithmetic. The entities in it that are conscious may have Borg like consciousness with no concept of individuals - they are all "aware" of the truths of arithmetic, so they all have the same thoughts.

They are aware of their beliefs/assumption/axioms/theories. They are extensions of arithmetic, like "PA + I am in Helsinki" + what they can deduce from that. Then, it is shown that hey have a rich "theology" including physics, so we can compare with the empirical physics. About Mars Rover, I don't know the program, and how much it has self- referential abilities. I doubt Mars Rover is Löbian, so his consciousness might the same as a ... salvia smoker (out of time and without any memory).

Bruno


Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to