Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Apr 2015, at 09:34, Bruce Kellett wrote:
I do not see any relationship, or even any real similarity between
these two models, apart from the fact that they both give
indeterminacy in a deterministic model.
The point made is logical. IF comp is true, they have to be the same,
and then the math, up to now, confirms it.
The logic is that they are different, therefore comp is false.
You rely a lot on your absolute faith that comp is true, so in your mind
these things have to work. The fact that they don't work is a flaw in
the physics according to you -- not that comp is false.
I am a physicist, I judge theories by the results they give. If a theory
does not agree with observation, then the theory is flawed. Your theory
does not give the MWI results, therefore your theory is either deeply
flawed or false.
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
