On 9 April 2015 at 11:16, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 08 Apr 2015, at 02:35, Bruce Kellett wrote: >> >> Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>>> On 07 Apr 2015, at 04:51, Bruce Kellett wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I understand what you are claiming, but I do not agree with it. The >>>>> primary physical universe certainly exists, >>>>> >>>> Then computationalism is false. But what are your evidence for a >>>> *primary* physical universe. That is an axiom by Aristotle, and I believe >>>> animals are hard-wired to make some extrapolation here (for not doubting >>>> the prey and the predators), but there are no scientific evidence for a >>>> *primary* physical object. >>>> >>> >>> There is no scientific evidence for a universal dovetailer either. >>> >> >> We don't need evidence here. The existence of the universal dovetailer, >> and of all its finite pieces of executions is already a theorem of very >> elementary arithmetic. Those things exist in the same sense that prime >> number exist. >> > > Which is merely as thought patterns in the brains of physical beings. A large (and familiar on this list) metaphysical leap, which fails to explain how two cultures can discover the same maths, or indeed why maths "kicks back" at all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
