On 6 May 2015 at 14:34, spudboy100 via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Much of the nobel committees even for physics and chemistry seem biased, > and subjective. Templeton, is for scientists with intellectual and > spiritual leanings, Nobel is best left to academic scientists who tow the > socialist line, and are nicely rewarded. Are all career academics like > that? No, but not making waves while obtaining government grants, goes a > long way to get along, and go along career wise. > > So you're saying Templeton is less biased and subjective? I'm not disagreeing, I just want to know what you think. I don't know much about either of them. (And what was that about 100F summers?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
