Respectability? You must mean what a majority or a self appointed peer group 
like in Oslo decide what is acceptable. By the way, how's those 100 degree 
Fahrenheit summers you have been having for the last 17 years? All the rock in 
scientists have proclaimed the happy hockey stick-for example. 



-----Original Message-----
From: LizR <lizj...@gmail.com>
To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Mon, May 4, 2015 10:08 pm
Subject: Re: Michael Shermer becomes sceptical about scepticism!


 
  
   
On 5 May 2015 at 12:01, meekerdb     <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:    
    
      
              
On 5/4/2015 11:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:        
        
        
        
         
On 04 May 2015, at 15:08, Telmo Menezes wrote:         
          
          
           
            
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List              
<everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:             
              
              I sure did, Telmo. Scroll to the bottom and you shall view my 
last, number 26th, the last one.             
              
              
              
              
Ah there you are! And you are not the only one from this list commenting there, 
it's a small world.             
              
              
              
              
My bet on computational after-lives is that we are in one already (an infinity 
of times), but this is completely transparent to us.             
              
              
              
               This kind of thing is interesting to me. I tend toward the 
materialist stuff since it seems to have potential. The mentalist stuff seems 
unreliable because people who have NDE's or trances have not come back with 
information.              
              
              
              
              
I would say that the important distinction is between communicable and 
non-communicable stuff. Science is about communicable stuff, but there is 
personal value in exploring the internal world -- although it won't get you a 
nobel prize or even any sort of recognition.             
             
            
           
          
          
This is because there is no Nobel Prize in Mathematics (not mentioning 
Theology).          
         
          
          
          
          
But you can have the Nobel prize of literature, and some text does indeed 
quasi-succeed, perhaps, in communication a bit of the uncommunicable. Then you 
can communicate a part conditionally, like if I am consistent then I can't 
justify that I am consistent, and the inetnsional variants.         
          
          
          
          
Bruno         
         
        
       You can get a Templeton, which is for merging science and religion and 
is worth more than a Nobel.
     
    
    
     
    
    
Do you mean it's worth more in monetary terms, or in terms of kudos, 
respectability, etc?    
    
     
    
   
  
 
  
 --  
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group. 
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to  everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
 To post to this group, send email to  everything-list@googlegroups.com. 
 Visit this group at  http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
 For more options, visit  https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to