Nobody ever mentions George Soros funding all democrat and leftwing groups for 
billions of dollars, or Tom Steyer, or the Blackstone Group funding the BHO 
2012 campaign. It is known why. Because the hypocrisy of focusing on the Koch's 
is progressive (read stalinist) strategy, while ignoring Soros, Steyer and 
Blackstone, and Comcast, who fund the"party."  Hypocrisy reeks, when the other 
Oligarchs of the Left, get identified and the silence from the progressives 
become deafening. I wonder how much the cost of buying voters with free cell 
phones cost? Oh yes, that was Mexican billionaire, Carlos Slim's company that 
made all those Bama phones. See? Rightwing corruption exists, but not Leftist. 
 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: meekerdb <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, May 5, 2015 9:51 pm
Subject: Re: quadratic voting


  
On 5/5/2015 5:34 PM, LizR wrote:  
  
  
   
    
     
On 5 May 2015 at 11:12, meekerdb      <[email protected]> wrote:     
      
       
        
         
          
           
            
             
              
Where does the money go once it's bought votes?              
              
             
            
           
          
          
         
        
 It's redistributed.  So after the Koch brothers spend $889,000,000 in the next 
election to cast 29,816 votes, each of the 129 million voters will get back 
$6.88 (plus the $1 they put in plus a share of whatever other big spenders put 
in).  Actually I think the Bros will be better off buying attack ads with their 
billion.       
       
      
      
      
      
      
Ah, I see. Since the various interest groups already spend millions on 
spreading their views via various media, presumably one caveat with QV would be 
that any form of political advertising or support for parties or editorialising 
"outside" the system would be illegal, and heavily penailsed if it occurred - 
otherwise the current system is far more efficient from the viewpoint of the 
1%, and they will just stick with using their newspapers and TV channels to 
support their chosen candidates.     
     
    
   
  
  
 I think you're right that such a restriction would be needed; but I don't know 
whether it's actually proposed that way.  I've never studied voting systems 
much beyond Arrow's theorem, but I know a mathematician who's writing a book 
about various systems.  He's not impressed by quadratic voting: 
  
  http://rangevoting.org/MonetizedRV.html 
  
 Brent 
  
  
   
    
     
      
      
      
      
Or am I missing the point?     
     
    
   
 --   
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.  
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to   [email protected].  
 To post to this group, send email to   [email protected].  
 Visit this group at   http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.  
 For more options, visit   https://groups.google.com/d/optout.  
  
  
  
 --  
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group. 
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to  [email protected]. 
 To post to this group, send email to  [email protected]. 
 Visit this group at  http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. 
 For more options, visit  https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to