On 07 Oct 2015, at 20:43, Brent Meeker wrote:



On 10/7/2015 3:47 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But I think that's wrong. Brains are not like ideal von Neumann computers or Turing machines that have "brain states" corresponding to "mental states". If you simulated a brain using a computer you would find that an enormous number of "brain states" were required to instantiate a single conscious thought and furthermore the brains states necessary for one thought overlapped with those necessary for the next thought. So this overlap at the low level is part of the physical continuity needed for consciousness.

But then you need to assume non-computationalisme, and consider yourself as a non Turing elumable reality. OK, but that does not solve the mind-body problem per se. It only introduce diffculties.

I didn't assume computationalism was false, I just assumed that relation between thoughts and computations was one->many.

OK. That is required from computationalisme.



If you instantiate thoughts by simulating a brain in a digitial computer then each thought or experience will correspond to many sequential steps in the computation, with no sharp division between one thought and the next.

Right. The very idea of time is a complex elaboration of the brain or the universal system. For us there is a short term treatment, and a long term treatment, involving different parts of the brain. Consciousness is the mental first person view of believing at least one constant truth, used as an etalon relatively to which things are known. It is used by attention to focus, or not, on the many thought associated to internal variate streams of subconsciousness processing.

But I don't see why you need physics. If the brain is Turing emulable at some level, at that level I can simulate the continuation in whatever universal system I decide to use, and if I use the game of life (say) the notion of step will be well defined, copiable, etc. And all those life patterns are simulated already by the true polynomial diophantine equation, in a way such that the indexical "you" can't see the difference locally.











The fact that the physics can be simulated by discrete computation doesn't imply that the conscious states are discrete.

The fact that consciousness state might be discrete implies that physics cannot be simulated by discrete computation. Physics needs all computations all at once to get the mathematically correct FPI.

??

You might reread step 7.

The fact that we are Turing emulable distributes our states in the infinitely many computations, and by the invariance of the number of steps of the UD, or the length of proofs of the sigma_1 truth, on which the first person has no access. The FPI makes the continuations inheriting the topology imposed by the logic of self-reference. Physics needs all computations, because it is the science of prediction, and by this FPI and the distribution, it is a complex statistics. fortunately the self-referential constraints determined the logic of the measure one, and so the logic of the "yes/no" experiments, which gives the elementary projector, which behaves with the right (almost) quantum logic(s). And as I said, we get the tools to distinguish the qualia from the quanta, and their different, but related, mathematics.


Bruno



Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to