On Friday, August 7, 2020 at 9:43:38 AM UTC-5 Bruno Marchal wrote: > On 7 Aug 2020, at 13:38, Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > That might be, but a programming language that has no context with > anything is not that valuable. > > > > At least, we should take the semantic of the reality on which that > language is based. A language per se is not enough. > > > > > > At least it is not that valuable to me. My point is this seems to connect > with concepts of spacetime as built up from large N entanglements. > > > I agree, and the entanglement must be explained from the first person > indeterminacy, singular and plural, which are imposed by incompleteness on > all “creatures” living in arithmetic (or at its internal phenomenological > border given by the self-reference mode available to the universal machine. > > With mechanism, physics is a branch of machine biology (or psychology, or > better “theology” …). > > Bruno >
But that has nothing to do with *physics*.. Physics only describes (in a language). Musing about its "meaning" is for philosophers to waste their time on. "Our best computer simulations, accurately describing everything [in physics], use only finite computer resources by treating everything as finite." -- Max Tegmark https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25344 @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7915f095-f2ae-43d2-8dd1-2ad6a8b7b4a8n%40googlegroups.com.
