Science doesn't deal in proofs, only in evidence. And the reality it
deals with is that which can be tested...i.e. is not "underlying".
Brent
On 12/21/2020 6:49 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Can you actually define "irreducible randomness" in order to prove
it's the underlying reality of the universe? If so, what is it? TIA, AG
On Monday, December 21, 2020 at 9:25:57 AM UTC-7 Lawrence Crowell wrote:
Bell's theorem and the Kochen-Specker theorem are indications of
an irreducible randomness to measurement outcomes in QM.
LC
On Thursday, December 17, 2020 at 12:50:58 PM UTC-6
agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
Can it be directly inferred from Heisenberg's Uncertainty
Principle? TIA, AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/80062de9-c99b-462c-b59a-a0e622775ec1n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/80062de9-c99b-462c-b59a-a0e622775ec1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/9654c839-31c3-4344-57c2-c5ecb9a031c7%40verizon.net.
