[Philip Benjamin]
Confusion worse confounded? Permanent records? Theoretical possibility of
different sectors interfering? Quarks and electrons are different sectors with
"permanent records". Will they not just "whizz around", at least say at some
"beginnings" (the imaginary Big Bang). How do they eventually form "protons"
and "neutrons" and remain separate from "electrons"? How do these "protons"
(and neutrons) remain "bound" together to form a nucleus of an atom, with
electrons in "permanent records of energy levels" orbiting around but not
falling into the nucleus? From whence comes the "permanent record" that an atom
may combine with another atom according to "permant records of the Laws of
Chemistry? From whence comes the "permanent record" that there will be atoms of
inert gases with a "stable" duet or octet of "electrons"? Will there be any
universe at all without these "permanent records", CopenPagan Interpretation
notwithstanding?
Philip Benjamin
From: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2021 2:41 PM Subject: Re: Why are laws of physics
stable?
On 7/10/2021 1:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> So, in general we can conclude by generalizing this to any large number of
> particles that even with what we consider to be permanent records, you don't
> get rid of the theoretical possibility of interference between the sectors
> where those records are different. We can if the universe is expanding faster
> than light beyond the Hubble radius.
Brent
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/SJ0PR14MB5264ADBCA39800A886B6808FA8169%40SJ0PR14MB5264.namprd14.prod.outlook.com.
