[Philip Benjamin]
Mathematics is a tool of science to solve problems, not reality itself , though
it may wrongly or rightly define reality or construct useful representations of
reality. The four coordinates of spacetime are non-Euclidian, and merely
coordinates. Only Euclidian geometry describes normal life. Mathematical models
of reality may not actually have any reflection on actualities of life. For
instance, Ptolemaic geocentric mathematical model of the solar system actually
produced very accurate predictions, but it has nothing to do with the reality
of heliocentrism. Trillions of physical particles are not whizzing around in
the universe of real objects, though they may be symbolically or mathematically
so presented as zipping around.
This basic aspect is missing in the CopenPagan Interpretation, because
Greco-Romo-Eastern pagan mysticism was circularly brought into science by
eminent pagan brains with un-awakened consciousnesses capable of reconning and
mathematizing infinite numbers, without recognizing that numbers and their
manipulations are no more real than any quale or experience thereof such as the
color green. There is no aseity, or meaning for numbers. Numbers are just
numbers. Equating them with ultimate reality is a CopenPagan absurdity.
Philip Benjamin
-----Original Message-----
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com <everything-list@googlegroups.com> On
Behalf Of Philip Benjamin
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2021 12:51 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: FW: Why are laws of physics stable?
[Philip Benjamin]
Confusion worse confounded? Permanent records? Theoretical possibility of
different sectors interfering? Quarks and electrons are different sectors with
"permanent records". Will they not just "whizz around", at least say at some
"beginnings" (the imaginary Big Bang). How do they eventually form "protons"
and "neutrons" and remain separate from "electrons"? How do these "protons"
(and neutrons) remain "bound" together to form a nucleus of an atom, with
electrons in "permanent records of energy levels" orbiting around but not
falling into the nucleus? From whence comes the "permanent record" that an atom
may combine with another atom according to "permant records of the Laws of
Chemistry? From whence comes the "permanent record" that there will be atoms of
inert gases with a "stable" duet or octet of "electrons"? Will there be any
universe at all without these "permanent records", CopenPagan Interpretation
notwithstanding?
Philip Benjamin
From: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2021 2:41 PM Subject: Re: Why are laws of physics
stable?
On 7/10/2021 1:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> So, in general we can conclude by generalizing this to any large number of
> particles that even with what we consider to be permanent records, you don't
> get rid of the theoretical possibility of interference between the sectors
> where those records are different. We can if the universe is expanding faster
> than light beyond the Hubble radius.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/SJ0PR14MB52648B911185B792BF889362A8159%40SJ0PR14MB5264.namprd14.prod.outlook.com.
