On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 7:48 PM George Kahrimanis <gekah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Exactly what axiom would that be? It can't be the Born rule because that >> is not an axiom, that is an experimentaly derived fact. >> > *> If I take some experimental result as granted, then it is an axiom, in > my system.* > If you wanna call the Born Rule an axiom then fine, but in that case it is an axiom that *EVERY* quantum interpretation needs, even the Shut Up And Calculate non-interpretation. So Many Worlds still needs fewer assumptions than any of its competitors and that's why William of Ockham tells us it is the interpretation to be preferred... at least until something better comes along ... if it ever does. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> 5L2 > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0zYeC%3Dmom-90bb_hcjhz9fDej503s6F0S3cceY4TGBVA%40mail.gmail.com.
