On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:48:02PM -0700, Liz R wrote:
> Thanks, Russell. Bruno tried to explain this to me a while ago but I probably
> didn't take it all in. Am I right in thinking this has something to do with
> "no
> oracles" - that is, reality contains no sources of infinite unpredictable
> data?
> A naked signularity would presumably count as an oracle, while it appears any
> area of space-time contains finite data (the Deckenstein bound?) - does that
> make it Turing complete, in principle? Or am I talking nonsense?
It sounds vaguely plausible, but could well be the latter :). At least
its not egregious nonsense like immigrants eating you pets :P.
Cheers
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/20240912071044.GC2031%40zen.
