On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 14:53, Luis Villa wrote: > In keeping with the holiday spirit, I want not to flame.
I can play the not flaming game :) > 3) I'm looking for confirmation ATM, but AFAIK there is exactly one > difference between our evo packages and RH's, and that's openssl v. > libnss. So saying we can't package our own software correctly and that > RH's packaging is somehow superior is completely bogus. Actually, our packages are built versus libnss3, we just compile it during the evolution build and link staticly. And most of our packages haven't gone out with pilot support enabled. As to the couple of people with Athlons reporting problems, you might try adding noathlon to your kernel line as the Athlon optimized memcpy() has caused some problems with some Athlon boards. Luis -- don't know about your laptop... have you tried running memtest86 on it? Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution