The real question, to my mind, is "why bother". There is no need to run these utilities, and hasn't been since the introduction of online maintenance, which gathers all of the white space in the database and essentially moves that white space into the back of the database where it can be overwritten.
Missy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:29 PM Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange I'm interested in hearing some sound arguments on why offline maintenance should *not* be performed ... I've heard/read quite a few people cringing about it, but can never back it up. I've been doing it for years without a hitch; I think as long as the proper precautions are taken and proper trending and planning is performed instead of just defragging willy-nilly, it's a pretty safe thing to do. I'm interested in hearing the other side, though ... anyone? Jon > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange > > > I'd bet the same people who say not to do exactly what you > are doing are VERY comfortable with esetuil and isinteg. > > That's precisely why they say *not* to do it. > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems > Atlanta, GA > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
