Big time.  You should have been in the room with the Outlook MVPs and the
Outlook Dev guys last Summit talking about the new security features.  I
feared lives would be lost.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> No kidding. Until you have sat in a room with 10 MVP's and 
> some MS development people, you have no idea.
> 
> Martin Blackstone
> Microsoft MVP.
> Mmmmm MVP
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:11 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> 
> 
> lol
> Thanks for the good laugh.
> I have found that the harshest critics of Microsoft products 
> are the MVPS
> themselves.
> 
> Andy David
> Microsoft MVP.
> There, is that better?
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM
> Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> 
> 
> > My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast 
> aspersions as to 
> > people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is 
> biased in one 
> > way or another.
> >
> > I believe that this is really systemic with regards to the 
> problems of 
> > the IT industry as a whole. The entire industry is vendor and tool 
> > focused and that is a huge problem in IT. It tends to 
> polarize people 
> > such that everyone is grouped into two categories, people 
> that hate a 
> > particular vendor or tool and people that love a particular 
> vendor or 
> > tool. This is just plain stupid.
> >
> > The IT industry has some fundamental problems. Microsoft, 
> as part of 
> > that industry suffers from some of the same problems as 
> well as some 
> > of their own unique deficiencies. Novell has their own 
> unique issues, 
> > so does IBM and so does every other vendor in this space. 
> But it seems 
> > that you cannot point out these deficiencies without people 
> > categorizing and stereotyping you in one way or another. I reject 
> > that.
> >
> > I hate all vendors of software tools equally. I find this 
> an absolute 
> > requirement to provide true, unbiased consulting services. 
> If you were 
> > to follow my posts on a GroupWise board or a Notes board, you would 
> > see me make similar arguments regarding the deficiencies of their 
> > products and company. However, since I make most of my revenue from 
> > Microsoft products and Exchange, I tend to be more active in that 
> > area.
> >
> > And the other thing that REALLY chaps me is people that cast 
> > aspersions on others without fessing up to their own 
> biases. MVP's are 
> > the worst of this lot. They secretly get direct compensation from 
> > Microsoft and then try to pass themselves off as unbiased. But you 
> > look at their posts and it is obvious that they are simply paid 
> > advocates for Microsoft and part of their responsibility is 
> to vilify 
> > anyone that says anything negative with regards to Microsoft. And 
> > these are the same people that list every last 
> certification and other 
> > acronym that they can paste onto the end of their sig, but 
> you never 
> > see Microsoft MVP. I wonder why? Microsoft asked me to 
> become an MVP 
> > and I told them to go jump in a lake. More people need to take this 
> > approach and be true consultants, not advocates.
> >
> > > Are you saying that your own interpretation of your own 
> attitude is 
> > > unbiased? Or that your own evaluation of whether or not your 
> > > paranioa about how Microsoft are out to get you is unbiased?
> > >
> > > Rob
> > > Also an MVP by the way.
> > > Want to throw some mud at me too?
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> > > > Sent: 07 February 2003 11:43
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft 
> MVP,=20  so 
> > > >whose interpretation is unbiased, mine or yours? =20
> > > > > I continue to believe my interpretation of your attitude is 
> > > > >more=20  accurate than your defense thereof. =20
> > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > > > > Tech Consultant
> > > > > hp Services
> > > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > > > >=20
> > > > >=20
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to