One word

ANTIGEN

www.sybari.com


Joseph Ambrose
System and Network Manager
The Conference Board
P: 001-212-339-0443
F: 001-212-836-3802
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Award Winning Web Site:  www.conference-board.org

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, March 20, 2002 6:56 PM
To:     MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:        RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks

No, we have A/V.  I'm looking at alternatives to IncoulateIT.

-----
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:54 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> 
> 
> no anti-virus?????? egads... 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:49 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> 
> 
> That's the rub.  We have had no problems with on campus 
> users.  All of our
> Exchange problems have been viruses.  I would have rather 
> spent the time and
> money on a virus wall, content inspection or an alternative 
> A/V solution.
> 
> -----
> Ken Leyba
> Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> California State University Dominguez Hills
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:40 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> > 
> > 
> > I have never worked for an .edu [1], but from my experience 
> > with people who
> > have, they often have users that like to test the boundaries 
> > of security and
> > go as far as their IT department allow.  I hope your students 
> > are not as
> > ambitious.
> > 
> > It's great you'll be able to block, say, ftp to Exchange, but 
> > the other
> > holes open up too many opportunities for fun.  Move the 
> firewall from
> > between the users and Exchange to between the internet and 
> the users.
> > 
> > [1] Hi Jamie
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:35 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> > 
> > 
> > IT.
> > 
> > -----
> > Ken Leyba
> > Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> > California State University Dominguez Hills
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:34 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The more important firewall is between the internet and your 
> > > organisation.
> > > 
> > > What is this guy a director of?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:32 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yes, the clients will use POP/SMTP, IMAP and MAPI.  That 
> > was my point
> > > exactly, we'll have two Swiss Cheese firewalls.  Unless the 
> > > Cisco PIX can do
> > > some kind of magic firewall tricks that I don't know about.
> > > 
> > > Ken
> > > 
> > > -----
> > > Ken Leyba
> > > Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> > > California State University Dominguez Hills
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:22 PM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > How are you intending these users access the exchange server? 
> > > > MAPI client
> > > > like Outlook?  
> > > > 
> > > > The holes necessary for your users to communicate with 
> > > > Exchange are such
> > > > that your firewall between the users and Exchange has been 
> > > > rendered useless.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:15 PM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Stupid Firewall Tricks
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Our director wants us to implement a firewall in front of 
> > > our Windows
> > > > 2000/Exchange 5.5 servers.  Here is what the scenario is:
> > > > 
> > > > Internet <--> Users <--> Firewall <--> Exchange
> > > > 
> > > > On the Exchange side we have the DC's, Exchange, IMC, OWA, 
> > > > etc. servers.  On
> > > > the public side we have the Windows 98/2000 clients, WINS 
> > > > server (which is a
> > > > whole different issue) and Internet.  There is a firewall 
> > before the
> > > > Internet connection but it is basically useless since nothing 
> > > > is configured.
> > > > On the private side we are to use NAT, since all the servers 
> > > > except the
> > > > backup server will need to be accessed from the outside I 
> > > > really don't see
> > > > what this is buying us.  Basically we are putting a firewall 
> > > > in front of
> > > > Exchange.  We are currently testing the configuration but I 
> > > > think this may
> > > > end up being a nightmare once we begin to change the Windows 
> > > > 2000 servers
> > > > (i.e. Active Directory) IP addresses and DNS settings to 
> > the private
> > > > addresses.
> > > > 
> > > > I began by making registry hacks to force the RPC's through 
> > > > specific ports
> > > > but our backbone admin figured out how to configure the PIX 
> > > > firewall without
> > > > me having to make the changes.  Now I'm reinstalling the test 
> > > > server to see
> > > > that it's actually working.
> > > > 
> > > > Can anyone give me any ammo as to why this is not the way to 
> > > > do things.  I
> > > > have tried to explain but I'm getting nowhere.  I don't 
> > > know maybe I'm
> > > > wrong.  However it seems it would be safer to implement the 
> > > > firewall at the
> > > > internet connection, we seem to be trying to protect 
> > > > ourselves from our
> > > > users.  There would be a lot of politics involved with the 
> > > > Internet firewall
> > > > but it does seem like the way to go.
> > > > 
> > > > Thx,
> > > > Ken
> > > > 
> > > > -----
> > > > Ken Leyba
> > > > Windows/Exchange System Administrator
> > > > California State University Dominguez Hills
> > > > 
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > 
> > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to