Hmm, good point (about solicited) - I don't like 'em either but can deal with them.
-----Original Message----- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load Just because you dont like OOO's doesn't mean something is broken or out of spec. And I think the point of "unsolicited" could be argued in court that it very well was solicited by posting to a very public list. On Jan 28, 2008 4:20 PM, Jason Gurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, the individual still has the option of fixing their own MUA > configuration, and should. This configuration has also been posted. If > Co. policy dictates they can't change that, then they have to option of > using foo free web mail provider (which can be configured to forward to > private email!). If they are unwilling to do that, then read the archives > on the web. > > There is absolutely no excuse to send unsolicited OOOs. The fact that > others are so lax doesn't make it any less of a problem. > > > ~JasonG -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
