I love the MS solution if it happens to a PF database.  YIKES!

-troy

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit

Is it just me, or is Exchange getting worse as it gets better..;)

S

-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Named Property Limit

I don't have an answer for you on that.

I suppose a mail gateway between your Exchange box and the Internet
could do some whitelisting, and discard any unrecognized headers, but
I wouldn't have a good guess as to how to go about it.

Kurt

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 13:43, McCready, Robert
<rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com> wrote:
> Is there a way to limit these X-headers, or find out what is causing so many?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 4:30 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Named Property Limit
>
> One of the things that seems to contribute are X- headers on inbound
> mail - each new X-header is a new named property.
>
> Want to DoS someone? Send them emails with new X-headers - lots of
> different ones.
>
> Spam seems to accumulate them, for one.
>
> Just looking at your message from the list, I see 4 different X-headers:
>
> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> x-ems-proccessed: jxfyzdhlyVyYF5VF4W3Asg==
> x-ems-stamp: sLcJ9ri/feAlRgbRlwdyOA==
>
>
> Kurt
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 13:20, McCready, Robert
> <rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understand this named property quota thing or how we reached
>> our limit...
>>
>>
>>
>> (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851492.aspx)
>>
>>
>>
>> but my question is, how big of a deal is it reall�������� We apparently 
>> reached
>> our 16,000 limit back in December, yet nobody has had any trouble
>> sending/receiving email.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: McCready, Robert [mailto:rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 2:41 PM
>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> Subject: Event 9667 Quota Limit on Named Property
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running Exchange 2007 SP1.������ Apparently, we have reached our 
>> "named
>> property" quota (which I do not completely understand) on one of our storage
>> groups.
>>
>>
>>
>> Event ID: 9667
>>
>> Source: MSExchangeIS
>>
>> Comput��������� Exchange 2007 mailbox clustered server
>>
>> Failed to create a new named property for database "SGx\MDBx" because the
>> number of named properties reached the quota limit (92��������  User 
>> attempting
>> to create the named property: "Hub Transport Server" Named property GUID:
>> xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxx Named property name/id: "pipe-summary"
>>
>>
>>
>> All the fixes I read say to either..
>>
>>
>>
>> Modify the registry and dismount/remount the database.
>> Create a new Storage Group and move all the mailboxes there.
>>
>>
>>
>> We've only been running Exchange 2007 for about 18 months��������� Is this a 
>> common
>> occurrence (reaching the quota limit)?������ Is there any way to find out if
>> there's a particular violator that may have caused us to reach this
>> quota��������� Would you recommend Fix number 1 or����������� Enough 
>> questions?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> �������� �������������������� ������������� 
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Nin��������������������������������������������������������������������������~
>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> �������� �������������������� ������������� 
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Nin��������������������������������������������������������������������������~
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to