We are keeping Cisco Call Manager for the primary call routing. We have call centers and need to do things that OCS cannot do. We are looking at replacing Unity Voice Mail with Exchange since the functionality is there and it would keep us from having to integrate the Unity system into our primary Exchange environment. The business is wanting the single mailbox but as a admin I do not want the telecom group to have the elevate rights that Unity requires. We are also looking at integrating OCS with the phone system but most likely in a split trunk because we will keep hard phones on each desk.
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 5:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension This conversation brings up the question about what phone hardware out there "works with Exchange?" I haven't been able to find any good/definitive resources. To the original poster, does this question mean that you are looking at replacing Unity with OCS 2007 R2? Please forgive me if that's a ridiculous question. I'm coming to the whole UC/UM arena from a place of complete ignorance. Thanks, RS On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Senter, John <john.sen...@etrade.com<mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com>> wrote: 7 From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com<mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com>] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension Just curious, what version of Unity are you using? From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com<mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com>] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 20007/2010 voice mail with multiple extension We are investigating replacing our Cisco Unity voicemail system with Exchange UM, looking at 2007 and 2010. In Unity you can assign multiple extensions to a single mailbox. Is this possible with Exchange UM? I have not found anywhere to indicate a extra number location. Thanks
