> These small things bring a really bad reputation to linux.
Don't exagerate. It's just you that's having problems, not the whole
Mandrake "community".
It has been stated that Supermount has some major issues. Therefore
in my thoughts it is unstable. Should it not carry a (experimental)
tag next to it since it has been stated that Reiser fs should do
the same (if it is even included in distros)
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Skwar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Why Supermount by default?
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 12:41:26AM -0400, Sarang Lakare wrote:
> If there is so much trouble with supermount, then why is it included by
> defaut? (I know there is a option to unclick it when u are in expert
> install).. but why keep somethgin thats beta??
Hmm, no problems here!
> How is autofs? can't we set its default directory to /mnt and install it?
Yes, I really second that! I like autofs a whole lot more than supermount.
Can't even think of a reason why supermount was introduced in the first
place, when autofs is working so fine!
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com
Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ: 7328191
