On Saturday 08 September 2001 00:43, you wrote:
> The constantly changing APIs/libraries.
>
> Moving from mdk7.2 to 8.0 required a complete reinstall to make
> sure no "ghosts from the past" remain to cause problems.  This
> is because massive amounts of upgraded libraries were introduced,
> and many directories were moved.  As we have seen so many threads
> here on this list, upgrading a mdk7.2 system in these 8.0 days
> requires compiling SRPMs, and many times, they won't work because
> of the aforementioned upgraded libraries and moved directories.
>
> Just recently, I upgraded from KDE 2.1.1 to 2.2.  *Definitely*
> not something that non-geeks would ever contemplate or be able
> to do.  Noone could contemplate it on a dial-up line.
>
> Take for example my wife.  She's been using the same Win98 box
> with Office97 for 3 years.  The only upgrade has been to IE5.5.
> She *likes* it that way.  Could she be a happy, unchanging linux
> desktop user for 3 years from 1998?  Don't think so.
>
> Could she be a happy linux desktop user for the 3 years starting
> now?  NO.  "Soon", qt3 will be released.  Then KDE3 will be re-
> leased.  Then will RPMs (or even SRPMs) created for KDE3 run on
> her 2.2.  Of course not, since mdk can't create *RPMs of new
> programs for old releases, even the last one, since the new programs
> use so many new features.
>
> Only when you can install a new RPM on a 3yo kernel/desktop will
> linux be ready for the mass market desktop.
>
> Comments?

Windows XP is intended to "Replace" Win9x Family, soon all win9x applications 
will be a ghost from the past.   "DOS" its gone... no more support, its a 
fact of life.   Things change so quickly that is really hard to keep up with 
all of them.

And Linux will soon replace many desktops... that also is a fact! ;-)

sk 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to