El lun, 28-01-2002 a las 04:48, ngn escribió: > Hi folks, I'm doubting to choose two different journalled FS ( XFS or RFS ) > > My opinion is that XFS has the best performance in all the fields. > Furthermore it has additional features due to its porting of IRIX, but I > also read that for other people RFS is the best one. > > Also I read that RFS performs best in small and medium size files. However, > XFS performs best in big size files and in big partitions. > > Besides, I read different tests that shows that XFS is the best in almost > all the fields, but I also read people who said that those results were > false due to that kernel has not all the RFS neccesary patches. > > Well, like you see, there are different points of view, so I wanna hear > yours!!!!!! > > My machine is a Pentium II Celeron 266 MHZ, with a Seagate of 40 GB [20 GB > for linux] and 160 MB of RAM > > Thanks in advance > > Nicolas Gomez > Montevideo, URUGUAY
Use what you want, but I had problems with RFS after several power failures, now I'm using XFS, is similar in speed and I'm having no troubles. But I used RFS with LM 8.0 and XFS in 8.1. I don't know how RFS is working now. Saludos, Óscar. -- .-. oo| /`'\ Usuario de Linux Registrado #227443 (\_;/) http://counter.li.org/
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
