I don't think that's right, Alexander. Transactions, yes, but I have heard a lot of complaining about how they implimented it . (It's not a feature I care about, so I really have not paid a lot of attention...) None of the other stuff is in the current stable version. 3.23.4x. They aren't in the beta 4.x yet either, and aren't scheduled to be implimented until 4.1 (read: anytime soon, if ever). There's some nice new stuff in the 4.x beta - but it is still that, beta.
>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar >Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:04 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [expert] databases for linux > > >»Joseph Braddock« sagte am 2002-02-20 um 19:16:20 -0600 : >> I'd have to concur with Rob. Postgres seems to be a very >feature rich and stable database. We are looking to moving some >of our Oracle databases to it. MySQL seems to get much more >press, but it simply lacks many features required for serious >database use (stored procedures, transactions, sub-selects, etc). >This is not intended to start a Postgres vs MySQL war (as both >have zealots). MySQL is very good at the things it does. But >because of it's limitations, it doesn't fit our specific needs. >> > >Well, MySQL *has* transactions and stored procedures (not as good as >Oracles, though). And I think sub-selects are also available in 4.x, >no? > > >Alexander Skwar >-- >How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) >Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen > Uptime: 4 hours 47 minutes > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
