On Mon, 27 May 2002 15:11:13 -0400 et <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> I haven't tested the memories yet, but the fact that > window$ does not freeze (there were some DLL errors as usual of > course,> but no freezes.) makes it unlikely to be a pure hardware > problem, IMHO.<end snipped section>
Not always... Windows actually does a better job of "mapping around" bad memory blocks than Linux. There does exist somewhere a tool for Linux that allows you to "block" bad sectors in ram. (need a 125 meg ram stick?) but it's not a pretty picture. Windows is capable of doing this "on the fly" so to speak so if ram is bad it isn't that obvious. I've got 3 ram sticks in my wifes windows box that work fine there but if I run memtest on them the have a cumulative 7 megs of bad sectors. Windows just maps around it and continues. Linux doesn't. (If I put one of these sticks in my box IF it boots I get freezes and all kinds of fun stuff.) James > wrong thinking (IMHO) windows only uses ram it needs and will have > lots of "wasted" ram, linux considers available ram not used for > system or program better used as cache for disk than left sit, this > causes some "marginal" ram (that sometimes only shows up as .dll > errors) to cause problems in Linux > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
