On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 22:13, rikona wrote: > Hello Eric, > > Sunday, October 12, 2003, 9:40:03 PM, you wrote: > > EH> That's the silly part: we're not really even asking for > EH> development. We just want them to get rid of the rejection of non > EH> IE browsers. It would mean *less* work and less code if they > EH> didn't put it in to begin with. > > I think it would be more work. They'd have to test it with other > browsers, and since different ones DO act differently, they'd have to > develop code to work in all of them. It seems to be easier (= cheaper) > to just put in a check and ask users to use IE. > > Many times one can view the code from a page and see where to go > anyway, but when you do, it doesn't work right. We need to let them > know they should code for other browsers.
or even better... get them to write w3c compliant code. (and if on our site you find a page that isn't let me know .... please.) Once I got that written in, every browser I test .... works right. (I'm not doing anything too fancy but the point is hopefully valid.) James
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
