--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hugheshugo" > <richardhughes103@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Jim for reminding me of my empowerment when I'm into full > > > whining mode. You get under my radar easily, calm me down a lot > > here > > > -- I owe ya a beer. > > > > > > > If an organisation as rich as the TMO is asking people who have > > already donated money for housing/travel etc, to provide winter > > clothes for children they haven't even seen I would say that's > enough > > of a story for most newspapers to make a meal of, or at least ask > > enough questions to find out the truth that people in fairfield > > should really know already. > > > > If this happened in England the government would have social > security > > banging on the dome doors demanding to see these underclothed > > children immediately ...or else. > > > You should get in touch with reporters then and see where this goes. > All I see now is a pile of assumptions, including the one about the > rich TMO, which I have always felt is pretty much a poor > organization, nowhere near as wealthy as say the Red Cross. >
Jim, if it was my country I would IF I thought children were going cold in an org as rich as this one. The TMO is loaded, just think how much land/buildings they've bought recently and how much the "rajas" pay for the priviledge. There is tons of money but no harm in trying to get a bit more out of the faithful.
