In a message dated 12/16/07 8:02:55 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Didn't I read in a post just a few days ago that you found some X Italian > president's accusation that 911 was an inside to be quite plausible and you had > no reason to doubt it? Reading comprehension is all important, bwana. You're apparently skipped over where I said *if* it was true, then..." By the way, what exactly was in that PDB that would > have tipped the President off that 19 Hijackers were going to Hijack those > flights and attack those specific targets on that day and at that time? Lacking those specific details doesn't justify ignoring it. The Bush administration refused to pay any attention to the briefings from Bill Clinton on Bin Laden given to Condi Rice, the intelligence agencies who were compiling the evidence on Bin Laden and terrorism, and neither George Tenet [CIA Director at the time] or Richard Clark [White House counterterrorism official at the time] Well, am I lying when I said that you said the x Italian president's accusations were very plausible and you had no reason to doubt them? To me, that means you believe his comments and accusations, that 911 was an inside job. But now you say you don't believe it was an inside job since it would be easier to smear Bush by saying he didn't take the PDB more seriously. By the way, what makes you think he ignored the PDB? All information was passed onto the FBI. / **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
