--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Anyone want to bet on how many posts these two are going 
> > > > > to waste on this silliness before they stop beating each 
> > > > > *other* up?
> > > >
> > > > Sal, it's the result of the devastating effects
> > > > of "spunge-brain syndrome."
> > > >
> > > > Those who suffer from this horrible disease can
> > > > go on like this for YEARS and still not realize
> > > > that they're making absolute asses of themselves.
> > > 
> > > A good glass of wine would do wonders.
> > 
> > I suspect it would take a whole bottle before 
> > either of them ever even *approached* being
> > human.  :-)
> 
> Shut up, Barry. You're irrelevant.

Make that two bottles for Judy. 

:-)  :-)  :-)

Just for fun, replacing the part of my post she so 
carefully snipped (the part she was pissed about):

> The gist of this act seems to be, "Ok everyone
> on FFL, watch as I demonstrate how incredibly
> dumb/ignorant of the facts/lazy/duplicitous 
> my opponent is."
> 
> Shemp's trying to do this to Judy. 
> 
> Judy's trying to do this to Shemp.
> 
> Both of them think we in the "audience" are 
> interested in the results.
> 
> Hasn't it ever occurred to *either* of them what
> happens if they "win" and "prove" that the other
> person IS as dumb as they think he/she is?
> 
> The "winner" will have proved that the "loser"
> is a bit of a retard.
> 
> And by doing so, the "winner" will have proved
> that he or she GETS OFF ON DEBATING WITH RETARDS.
> 
> Now THAT's a real challenge, right?
> 
> :-)



Reply via email to