--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > Anyone want to bet on how many posts these two are going > > > > > to waste on this silliness before they stop beating each > > > > > *other* up? > > > > > > > > Sal, it's the result of the devastating effects > > > > of "spunge-brain syndrome." > > > > > > > > Those who suffer from this horrible disease can > > > > go on like this for YEARS and still not realize > > > > that they're making absolute asses of themselves. > > > > > > A good glass of wine would do wonders. > > > > I suspect it would take a whole bottle before > > either of them ever even *approached* being > > human. :-) > > Shut up, Barry. You're irrelevant.
Make that two bottles for Judy. :-) :-) :-) Just for fun, replacing the part of my post she so carefully snipped (the part she was pissed about): > The gist of this act seems to be, "Ok everyone > on FFL, watch as I demonstrate how incredibly > dumb/ignorant of the facts/lazy/duplicitous > my opponent is." > > Shemp's trying to do this to Judy. > > Judy's trying to do this to Shemp. > > Both of them think we in the "audience" are > interested in the results. > > Hasn't it ever occurred to *either* of them what > happens if they "win" and "prove" that the other > person IS as dumb as they think he/she is? > > The "winner" will have proved that the "loser" > is a bit of a retard. > > And by doing so, the "winner" will have proved > that he or she GETS OFF ON DEBATING WITH RETARDS. > > Now THAT's a real challenge, right? > > :-)