--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Here are three articles that document Bill and Hillary's > > conservative > > > records: > > > > > > The first from the left-wing New Yorker: > > > > > > http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/09/17/070917fa_fact_lizza > > > > > > The second from a right-winger: > > > > > > > > > http://townhall.com/columnists/BruceBartlett/2007/05/01/conservatives_ > > > for_hillary > > > > > > The third from an article that I believe either Barfitu or Robert > > the > > > Rhymer posted here and is from an EXTREME left-wing source: > > > > > > http://www.isreview.org/issues/13/clinton-gore.shtml > > > > > > But you go ahead, Judy, you sweet dear thing, and continue on > with > > > the illusion that the Clintons are "centrist Democrats". Why, to > > > take an alternative position would mean that you would actually > > > have to think for yourself and, hey, we can't have that! > > > > Funny, because triangulating from these three > > pieces shows as clearly as can be that Clinton > > is a centrist Democrat. Good choices, Shemp. > > Funny, because unless you speed read at three times the fastest > known rate, there's no way you could have read them all by the > time you posted.
Don't be silly. I read fast, and they aren't *that* long. Took me about a half an hour. I did just skim the last half of the third one, though. > Nice try. > > Also, nice try in hoodwinking people to believe that the > articles show anything but what I suggested. Read them again, Shemp. They don't say what you wish they said.
