--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ruth, excellent response and post. I disagree only with your 2d > Amend. analysis. Gun ownership by the individual is fundamental to > this country; in the last few years many constitutional experts have > examined the 2d Amend. and construed it to guarantee rights to the > individual, rather than the government militia. In my read that's > exactly what it states. > > "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a > free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall > not be infringed."
And where are the militias who bear arms to protect the security of their states?
